HARMFUL DIVIDE BETWEEN RAJBANSHIS AND KOCH-RAJBANSHI
What I feel that we should not blindly believe in the sayings or writings of non-Rajbanshi personalities including foreign historians, although some foreign historians tried to pen down true history of Rajbanshis . What I suggest that Rajbanshis should write their own histories themselves to being out the true happenings of the historical past. You all will believe that Ahom rulers are being highlighted by Assamese historians and in similar way, Mughals & Muslim rulers by Bangladeshi & Bengali historians, Mauriyas & Awadh rulers by Bihari historians and Rana rulers by Nepali historians and so on. What about history of Barman, Narayani, Kamota, Koch rulers and pristine glories of Rajbanshi society during ancient, medieval India till lat century? How many Indians do know about Vishwa Veer Chilarai whose heroics can be compared with Napoleon Bonaparte, Chhatrapati Shivaji, Maharana Pratap et al? Please do not fall prey of "Divide and Rule" policies. If we go