ST STATUS TO KOCH-RAJBONGSHIS OF ASSAM - SIMPLY NOT ENOUGH



The news on likely grant of scheduled Tribe status to Koch-Rajbanshis in Assam has been hailed by young Koch-Rajbongshis of Assam as they are hopeful to get jobs. While intellectuals among them are silent and shy, most of the educated lot of Rajbonghsi(including Rajbanshi Kshatriyas)) communities have taken it with mixed feelings. It happened earlier also; ST status was granted to Koch-Rajbongshis through an ordinance in Assam once before, but was in vogue for only few years. Is the move a step to put the clock back once again?

Article 342 of the Constitution of India notifies Scheduled Tribes as having five major characteristics - primitive traits, geographical isolation, distinct culture, shyness of contact with community at large and economic backwardness. Do these characteristics still exist in Koch-Rajbongshsis of Assam? Not going by the answer in proper, let us see its implications.

This time, motive of grant of ST status is different – to stop foreigners (Bangladeshis) to grab lands in Assam.  Does it mean that Koch-Rajbongshis will have socio-economic and political rights in at least half a dozen districts in lower Assam and will have a chance to rule themselves? Will it happen that they will no more remain subjugated under mainstream Assamese people?

 May be, there is hidden agenda behind granting ST status to these people which may lead to making them second grade citizen perpetually. And, of course, finish them politically and socially...I have lot many doubts. What about Rajbanshi Kshatriyas of North Bengal and few districts in Bihar? Will they accept ST status? These Rajbanshi kshatriyas take pride in being upper caste Hindu. If they are declared ST, then they will be equated with other STs like Santals, Oraons etc. who are mostly Christians. Does it mean that someday, Rajbanshis also will convert to Christianity? This questions arises to some Hindu and Rajbanshi Kshatriya leaders who fear of slow death of Hindu people from India, especially the Kshatriyas. 

 What will RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad(VHP) will say in such a move of the Govt., is yet to be seen.  

Simply, status of ST with only 7% to 10% reservation in job market will make them to get extinct from their motherland. Being ethnic people and majority in population, they need to have a say in their governance. Again, I reiterate the dictum of democratic principle -“People like to be ruled by themselves”. Mind it, Rajbanshi dominated areas of North Bengal and Lower Assam  are having immense strategic value militarily which is to be considered for any future decision. 

 They must be given civil and political rights as enshrined in Part-X, “The Scheduled and Tribal Areas”, Article 244 in the Constitution of India. They must administer their own areas as per wide ranging powers given in the Sixth Schedule. Simply, ST Status is not enough. Option for a separate State for them should not be ruled out.

 In fact, demand for separate 'Kamatapur' or 'Kamata-Greater Koch Behar' state is much older than any such demand elsewhere in the country and it is more genuine than others including those newly create states. If separate State is granted, then only they will be able to have all the rights such as job reservation of more than 50%, own people in the government and real development of the people.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SOCIAL ISSUES & SC/ST STATUS OF RAJBANSHI/ KOCH-RAJBANSHI GROUP OF PEOPLE

I. Geographical and Demographic Positions of Rajbanshi Group of People The ethnically one, Rajbanshi group, one of the most tolerant indigenous people of strategically located areas in whole of North Bengal(barring its hilly terrains); in a sizable portion of Assam; western part of Meghalaya; Purnia, Kishanganj districts and eastern part of Katihar district of Bihar; Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari districts of Nepal; Rangpur, East Dinajpur districts and some parts of north west Mymensingh, northern Rajshahi and Bogra districts of Bangladesh and lower parts of Bhutan where these indigenous people ordinarily reside from time immemorial. They are known as Koch-Rajbongshi in Assam, Rajbanshi Kshatriya, Palia, Surjapuria in North Bengal and Bihar; Rajbanshi/Koch Rajbanshi/Tajpuria in Nepal and Koch-Rajbongshi in Meghalaya and their adjoining areas. Rajbanshi Muslims are integral part of these communities because of the one language and one culture. They are victims of identity
Read more

RAJBANSHI-KAMTAPURI - AN OLD LANGUAGE AND NOT A MERE DIALECT

RAJBANSHI-KAMTAPURI - AN OLD LANGUAGE AND NOT A MERE DIALECT It hurts my feelings if someone says that Rajbanshi or Kamtapuri is mere a dialect a not a language. After painstaking work of almost ten years, I endeavoured to find out the truth about the language and penned it down in my book ‘Koch Rajbanshi Kamtapuri – The Truth Unveilled (Guwahati, 2007) . To clear the doubts about this language, I wish to reproduce some relevant portions of the book as follows: [ “…. It was not an easy task to ascertain the circumstances under which today’s North Bengal and its neighboring areas lost their pristine glory, which, otherwise was once a central hub for acculturation among various races in northeastern part of India. Their language that was once believed to be the lingua-franca of the entire Koch Empire is dying today due to non-recognition. It still holds good for the Rajbanshi people to take Bankim’s suggestion seriously and get onto the job of writing history lest Koch or Rajb
Read more

Inclusion of Cooch Behar State with Dominion of India and Subsequent Merger with West Bengal: The Turbulent Political Phase

Excerpt from my book “Koch Rajbanshi and Kamtapuri – The Truth Unveiled”(Guwahati, 2007) … When the freedom struggle engulfed whole of India by turn of nineteenth century, Koch-Kamta people of North Bengal jumped into it. Many unknown freedom activists went to jails and many made their supreme sacrifices. On 18 th July 1947, Indian Independence Act was passed in British Parliament. India became a free nation on 15 th August 1947. As per Section 7(I) of the said British act, it was stated that British Crown lapsed their paramount hold over the Indian Princely states and these were free to either join any dominion of India and Pakistan or remain sovereign. Soon after India won her independence on the 15 th August, 1947, most of the erstwhile princely states numbering more than five hundred lined up for inclusion either with dominion of India or Pakistan. Except few princely states like Junagarh, Jammu & Kashmir, Hyderabad most of them had no choice but to agree to the instru
Read more